indiaemi.com No signup·No login·No phone number·No spam all calculations run in your browser
Prepay vs Invest Calculator

Prepay the loan or invest the surplus?

You have extra money. Two options: send it to the bank (prepay) or invest it (mutual funds, FD, equity). After tax, which one earns you more? This calculator does the math.

01Your numbers
Outstanding loan amount
₹5L₹50L₹1Cr₹2Cr
Needed to model the ₹2L Sec 24(b) cap — the cap is a rupee limit, not a rate.
Remaining tenure yrs
1102030
Surplus you have to deploy
₹50k₹10L₹25L₹50L
Loan interest rate %
6%10%14%20%
Expected investment return (pre-tax) %
4%8%12%20%
Equity MF: ~12% long-term · PPF: 7.1% · FD: 6-7% · ELSS: ~12-14%
Your tax slab %
0%5%20%30%
4% health & education cess is added automatically (30% → 31.2%).
Which tax regime are you on?
On the new regime, Sec 24(b) on a self-occupied home is zero — the loan costs you the full rate.
Is this a home loan?
Home loan interest gets Section 24(b) deduction. This lowers the "effective" loan rate.
Investment type
02The verdict
live
Better choice
Extra wealth at horizon
enter values to see
Effective loan cost (after tax) 0%
Effective investment return (after tax) 0%
Interest actually sheltered by Sec 24(b)
Equity must beat this to win
Wealth at horizon — prepay
Wealth at horizon — invest
Risk-adjusted recommendation

How this calculator thinks about the decision

The question "prepay or invest?" is fundamentally about comparing two interest rates:

  • The effective cost of your loan after tax benefits (for a home loan, much lower than the nominal rate; for a car or personal loan, the nominal rate itself).
  • The effective return on your investment after tax on gains — equity LTCG is 12.5% with the first ₹1.25 lakh of gains each year exempt; debt is taxed at your slab; PPF is tax-free.

If the effective investment return is higher, investing mathematically wins. If the effective loan cost is higher, prepaying wins.

For home loan borrowers in 30% slab

₹50L outstanding at 8.5% over 20 years, 30% slab, on the old regime: the ₹2 lakh Section 24(b) cap shelters only 64% of your lifetime interest (just 47% in year 1), so the effective rate is 6.79% — not the 5.95% a naive rate × (1 − slab) would give you. Equity at 12% gross → 10.5% after 12.5% LTCG. Investing wins, but by ~0.9%/yr, not 4%.

Same loan on the new regime: Section 24(b) is zero, so the loan costs the full 8.5%. Investing still wins at 12%, but equity now has to clear 9.38% gross just to break even — against 8.33% on the old regime. Below roughly 9%, prepaying wins outright.

For car or personal loan borrowers in 30% slab

Personal loan at 14%: no Section 24(b) at all, so the effective rate is the full 14%. Equity at 12% pre-tax → ~10.5% after LTCG. Prepaying wins comfortably — and it is the guaranteed option, not the risky one. Clear expensive debt before investing a rupee.

The math is only half the story

Even when investing wins mathematically, prepayment has non-financial benefits:

  • Psychological peace — being debt-free is its own reward, especially in volatile markets
  • Guaranteed return — prepaying gives a certain saving; investments may underperform expectations
  • Cash flow improvement — lower EMI frees monthly income for other goals
  • Reduced financial vulnerability — less debt means more resilience to income disruptions (job loss, illness)

Many financial planners suggest a hybrid approach: prepay enough to cut your loan tenure to a comfortable level (15 years instead of 25, say), then invest the rest. This balances mathematical advantage with psychological comfort.

When investing definitely doesn't make sense

  • If you have credit card debt at 36-42% (always pay this off first)
  • If you have personal loan debt above 15% (usually pay this off before investing)
  • If you don't have an emergency fund of 6 months' expenses (build that first)
  • If you're close to retirement and prioritizing safety

Sources & standards

Every regulated figure on this page, what it is, and the primary source it comes from. Two Acts are live: the Income-tax Act, 1961 governs FY 2025-26 — the return being filed now — while the Income-tax Act, 2025 governs FY 2026-27 onward. The amounts are unchanged; only the section numbers moved.

WhatCurrent valueSourceVerified
Interest deduction cap — self-occupied property₹2,00,000/yrIncome-tax Act, 1961 — s.24(b) (FY 2025-26 & earlier)
Income-tax Act, 2025 — s.22(1)(b) & (c); cap in s.22(2) (in force 1 Apr 2026)
2026-07
Principal repayment deduction cap (shared with EPF, PPF, ELSS, insurance)₹1,50,000/yrIncome-tax Act, 1961 — s.80C (FY 2025-26 & earlier)
Income-tax Act, 2025 — s.123, read with Schedule XV (in force 1 Apr 2026)
2026-07
Default tax regime — disallows s.24(b) self-occupied, 80C and HRAstd deduction ₹75,000
7 slabs, top rate 30%
Income-tax Act, 1961 — s.115BAC (FY 2025-26 & earlier)
Income-tax Act, 2025 — s.202 (in force 1 Apr 2026)
2026-07
Optional regime — retains deductions at higher slab ratesstd deduction ₹50,000
4 slabs, top rate 30%
2026-07
Long-term capital gains — listed equity12.5%
first ₹1,25,000/yr exempt
Finance (No.2) Act, 20242026-07
Health & education cess on income tax4%2026-07

Not tax or legal advice. See every standard this site uses →